Ramblings of an aging IT geek
← Ramblings of an aging IT geek
personal

i picked up the film camera again, and it slowed me right down

After years of phone photography I dug out a 35mm camera, shot a few rolls badly, and remembered why constraints can be a gift.

A flat lay of an old film camera beside coffee and a notebook

There is a box in the loft that I have moved between three houses without opening. Last weekend, looking for something else entirely, I opened it. Inside, wrapped in a tea towel that I vaguely recognised as having once lived in a kitchen drawer, was a film camera I bought in my early twenties and then quietly stopped using when phones got good enough to make me lazy.

I'd forgotten how heavy it is. That's the first thing. A proper old camera has a density to it that a phone doesn't, a sense that it's a tool that does one thing and expects you to do the rest. I put a battery in it, the light meter twitched, and I felt an embarrassing little flush of delight that it still worked at all.

the maths of thirty-six frames

The thing that came back fastest, and the thing I'd most thoroughly forgotten, is what it does to your attention to have exactly thirty-six exposures and no preview.

With a phone I take eleven photos of the same thing, choose one later, and delete the rest without looking. The whole process is deferred. The decision about whether a photo is any good happens at home, on a screen, long after the moment has gone. It costs nothing to take a bad photo, so I take dozens of them, and I look at the world through a viewfinder I'm not really paying attention to because the camera is doing all the thinking.

Film reverses that. Every frame is a small commitment. You can't chimp the back of the camera to see if you got it, because there's no back to chimp. You have to decide, before you press the shutter, that this is worth one of your thirty-six. So you stand there. You actually look. You wait for the light to do the thing, or for the person to stop fidgeting, or for the bus to clear the frame. The constraint forces a kind of patience that I'd let atrophy completely.

A quiet landscape, the sort of scene worth one frame

being bad at something on purpose

I am, it turns out, quite bad at this now. The first roll came back from the lab and roughly a third of it was unusable. I'd misjudged exposure in a way the phone would have silently corrected for me. A couple were out of focus because I'd forgotten that focus is now my job and not the camera's. One was a beautiful composition of my own thumb.

And yet I didn't mind, which surprised me. There's a particular pleasure in being a beginner at something again, especially when you spend your working life being expected to be competent. At work, a mistake is a problem. Here, a wasted frame is just a wasted frame, and the stakes are precisely nothing. I'd forgotten how freeing it is to do something where the worst possible outcome is a photo of my thumb.

The keepers, when they came, felt earned in a way a phone photo never quite does. Not because they're technically better. A modern phone would out-resolve this camera in every measurable way and probably get the exposure right too. They feel earned because I had to commit to each one, and because I couldn't fix it afterwards. The photo is a record of a decision I made in the moment, right or wrong, and there's an honesty to that.

the gap between shutter and seeing

The other thing film does, which I'd completely forgotten, is reintroduce a wait. You take the photo, and then you don't see it for a week. The roll has to finish, the lab has to develop it, and only then do you find out whether you got the thing or whether you got your thumb again. By the time the photos come back, you've half-forgotten taking them, so you see them fresh, almost as if someone else shot them.

I'd lost that gap entirely. With a phone, the photo exists the instant you take it, and you've usually judged it, kept it or binned it, before the moment has even finished happening. There's no distance. You never get to be surprised by your own work, because you've already seen it and formed an opinion while it was still warm. The week-long wait gives you that distance back, and distance turns out to be where a lot of the pleasure lives. Opening the envelope from the lab is genuinely exciting in a way that swiping through a camera roll has never once been.

It also means you can't endlessly reshoot. By the time you know a frame didn't work, the scene is long gone and so is the light, and the person you photographed has moved on to a different country. You get what you got. There's a finality to it that the phone, with its infinite retries, has quietly trained out of me. I'd become someone who assumed everything was fixable later, and film politely informed me that no, sometimes the moment was the only chance, and you either paid attention or you didn't.

Another frame, the second of the two keepers

why constraints keep finding me

I've been thinking about why this landed so hard, and I think it's because the same lesson keeps turning up in my actual work, just wearing a different hat.

The best systems I've built have all had constraints baked in deliberately. A queue with a fixed depth that forces you to deal with back-pressure honestly. A deploy process that's slow enough that you batch changes and think before you ship. A budget that says no to the clever thing so you build the simple thing. Every time, the constraint felt like an annoyance at first and turned out to be the thing that made the result good. Unlimited options mostly produce unlimited dithering.

The same goes for writing. The posts I'm happiest with are the ones I wrote against a word count or a deadline, where I couldn't keep polishing forever and had to decide what actually mattered and cut the rest. Given infinite time and infinite space, I produce something baggy that tries to say everything and ends up saying nothing in particular. Given a limit, I'm forced to choose, and the choosing is where the quality comes from. The limit does the editing I'm too fond of my own words to do myself.

Thirty-six frames is just that idea, made physical and put in my hands. The limit isn't a bug. The limit is the entire point. It makes each choice matter, and when each choice matters you start paying attention, and paying attention turns out to be most of what was missing.

I've ordered more film. I'm going to stay bad at this for a while, deliberately, and enjoy every wasted frame. It's the most relaxed I've felt about a hobby in years, precisely because I've given myself permission to be rubbish at it. The phone can keep doing the eleven-photos-and-delete-ten thing for the holiday snaps. This is for the looking.