Ramblings of an aging IT geek
← Ramblings of an aging IT geek
personal

working from home, with the gloss taken off

A few years into remote work, here is what actually helped and what the cheerful productivity advice gets wrong.

A coffee mug beside a stack of books

I've been working from home long enough now that the novelty has fully worn off, which is exactly the right vantage point to be honest from. The early days were all extremes: either it was the best thing that had ever happened to my concentration, or I was talking to the cat by half past three. Several years in, the truth is duller and more useful than either of those, and most of the advice you read about it is written by people still in the honeymoon phase or selling you a standing desk.

the part nobody warns you about

The hard part of working from home is not discipline. I had assumed it would be, that without a manager visible over a partition I'd dissolve into a puddle of distraction. The opposite turned out to be the problem. The hard part is stopping. When the laptop is right there, and the commute that used to bookend the day is gone, the day has no edges. You finish a thing at 18:30 and there's no train to catch, so you start the next thing, and suddenly it's dark and you've done a ten-hour day without noticing, and you'll do it again tomorrow because nothing stopped you.

The office, for all its faults, imposed boundaries you didn't have to maintain yourself. People got up and left, and that was permission to leave too. The lights got a bit sadder. Someone said "right, that's me." At home you have to manufacture all of that, and the manufacturing is genuine work that nobody costs into the "no commute, so much time saved" arithmetic.

A wide quiet landscape under open sky

what actually helped

So here is what I do, stripped of the wellness-blog framing. None of it is clever. The value is entirely in doing it consistently rather than in the ideas themselves.

I have a hard stop, and I treat it like a meeting I can't move. Not a vague intention to finish around six, an actual time at which I close the laptop lid, and if the thing isn't done, the thing isn't done, and it'll be there in the morning when I'm sharper anyway. The number of "urgent" evening problems that turned out to be perfectly fine the next day is, frankly, embarrassing.

I go outside before I start, even for ten minutes, even when it's grey and drizzling, which where I live is most of the time. It's a manufactured commute. It does the same psychological job the real one did: a buffer between not-working and working, so I arrive at the desk already in the right gear instead of rolling from bed to keyboard with my brain still in sleep mode.

  • A separate space, even a corner, that means "work" and gets left at the end of the day.
  • A real lunch away from the desk, not a sandwich eaten over the keyboard while I keep typing.
  • Camera off when it adds nothing, because performing attentiveness on video is its own quiet tax.

the social thing is real

The bit I underrated for the longest is the social cost, and I say this as someone fairly content in his own company. The office gave me a low background hum of human contact I didn't have to arrange: the kitchen, the corridor, the conversation that solves a problem in ninety seconds because you happened to be standing near the right person. At home all of that becomes deliberate. You have to schedule the thing that used to be ambient, and a scheduled chat is never quite the same as bumping into someone, because the serendipity was the point.

I don't have a tidy fix for that. What I have is an awareness of it, which at least stops me mistaking a fortnight of feeling oddly flat for some deeper problem when really I've just not spoken to a colleague face to face in too long. So I make the effort. I go in occasionally even though I don't strictly need to. I say yes to the call that could have been an email, sometimes, because the inefficiency is the value.

the honest bottom line

I wouldn't go back to five days in an office, and I'd be wary of anyone who tells you working from home is straightforwardly better or straightforwardly worse. It's a trade. You swap a commute and an imposed structure for autonomy and the obligation to build that structure yourself, and whether that's a good trade depends entirely on whether you actually do the building. The freedom is real. So is the work of staying well inside it, and the cheerful version that skips that second part is selling you something. Done with my eyes open, it suits me. But it took years to learn it isn't free, and the price is paid in small daily acts of discipline that look like nothing and are, in fact, the whole job.